miercuri, 4 iulie 2012

Aldehida formica ne aduce cancerul deja ambalat, in vaccinuri

Este oficial inca de acum un an (a aparut pana si pe site-ul "National Cancer Institute"): "omii" de stiinta ai guvernului american au admis intr-un sfarsit ca aldehida formica trebuie plasata pe lista substantelor cancerigene!! Agentia Internationala pentru Cercetare despre Cancer (IARC) clasifica aldehida formica ca si carcinogen uman (IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Volume 88 (2006), Formaldehyde, 2-Butoxyethanol and 1-tert-Butoxypropan-2-ol). In 2011, Programul National de Toxicologie, un program de inter-agentii al Departmentului Sanatatii si Serviciilor Umane, a clasificat aldehida formica ca si carcinogen uman cunoscut in al 12-lea Raport asupra Carcinogenelor.

Wow, ce mai cucerire stiintifica!! Se stia chestia asta de vreo 50 de ani, cam atat le-a trebuit ca s-o admita public :-(

Ah, o precizare: studiile s-au facut numai pe baza expunerii la aldehida formica sub forma de atingere sau inhalare. De ce oare n-or fi facut si un studiu in care sa se vada consecintele injectarii aldehidei formice in organismul unui bebelus al carui sistem imunitar si a carui bariera cerebrala inca nu sunt complet dezvoltate?


Guvernul american recomanda reducerea expunerii la aldehida formica. Suntem avertizati cu generozitate ca aldehida formica se afla in furnirul mobilei (si trebuie sa aerisim si mai bine), se mai afla si in placile aglomerate, in anumite produse utilizate in saloanele de coafura... Foaaaarte important, mai ales ca sunt foarte multi oameni care isi ling mobila de 5 ori pe zi sau care isi injecteaza spuma de par prin vene ;-(((

Ah, pardon, apropo de injectare, ce au uitat dumnealor sa precizeze este ca aldehida formica este foarte prezenta in vaccinuri!! Informatia vine din insusi templul oficial al inselaciunii mondiale, CDC (Center for Diseases Control): AICI si AICI. Asta pentru naivii care vor surse oficiale - pe pariu ca nici sursele oficiale nu le vor deschide ochii?

Iata si o poza, ca sa fie totul mai clar:



Iata in ce vaccinuri se afla (recunoscut oficial) aldehida formica: Anthrax (BioThrax), DTaP (all brands), DTaP-Hep B-PPV (Pediarix), DTaP-Hib (TriHIBit), DT (all brands), Td (all brands), Hepatitis A (Havrix, Vaqta), Hepatitis A-Hepatitis B (Twinrix), Hib (ActHIB), Hib-Hepatitis B (Comvax), Influenza (Fluzone, Fluarix, FluLaval), Japanese encephalitis (JE-Vax), Polio-virus inactivated (Ipol), Tdap (Adacel, Boostrix) conform cartuliei roz a CDC, Vaccine Excipient & Media Summary, pg. E-2

Deci sa ne intelegem, recomandarea guvernului american suna asa: nu atingeti obiecte cu aldehida formica, nu inhalati aldehida formica, feriti-va cat puteti, dar lasati sa fie injectata in organismul copiilor vostri!

Si pe pariu ca se merge mai departe cu vaccinarea ca si pana acum, iar domnilor producatori de vaccinuri gura le miroase doar a micsunele ca si pana acum??? In fond, cati parinti isi duc copiii la vaccinare si solicita sa citeasca prospectul vaccinurilor ca sa vada toate otravurile care sunt injectate in organismul copiilor lor? Asta ar echivala cu crima de lezmajestate de a pune sub semnul indoielii integritatea medicului pediatru si - dupa cum stim - iubitorii de vaccinuri refuza cu obstinatie sa-si puna la contributie propriul creier, din moment ce e mult mai comod (si lipsit de orice conflicte interioare) sa aiba incredere in ce le spune "specialistul" :-(


Iata un citat dintr-unul din raporturi (cred ca e usor de inteles si pentru cei care nu stapanesc asa bine limba engleza):

Carcinogens Background Document
Formaldehyde ingestion results in severe corrosive damage to the gastrointestinal tract followed by CNS depression, myocardial depression, circulatory collapse, metabolic acidosis and multiple organ failure. The toxic effects of formaldehyde in experimental animals include irritation, cytotoxicity, and cell proliferation in the upper respiratory tract, ocular irritation, pulmonary hyperactivity, bronchoconstriction, gastrointestinal irritation, and skin sensitization.  Other reported effects include oxidative stress, neurotoxicity, neurobehavioral effects, immunotoxicity, testicular toxicity, and decreased liver, thyroid gland, and testis weights (IARC 2006, Asian et al. 2006, Sarsilmaz et al. 2007, Golalipour et al. 2008, Ozen et al. 2005, Majumder and kumar 1995).

Iata un pasaj extrem de interesant dintr-un articol redactat de autoarea

The key to all the above, as I assess it, is this which the formaldehyde document points out:

Genetic and related effects: Formaldehyde is a direct-acting genotoxic compound that affects multiple gene expression pathways, including those involved in DNA synthesis and repair and regulation of cell proliferation. … In vitro studies with mammalian and human cells were positive for DNA adducts, DNA-protein crosslinks, DNA-DNA crosslinks, unscheduled DNA synthesis, single-strand breaks, mutations, and cytogenetic effects (chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, and micronucleus induction).

A DNA adduct is a base in the DNA covalently [sharing electrons from one to another] bonded to a (cancer-causing) chemical.  This has been shown to be the start of a cancerous cell, or carcinogenesis.

Now, I have one more question to ask, and it is this:  Coincidentally childhood cancers have been on the rise precipitously and concomitantly, it seems, with the rise in mandated vaccinations starting as early as birth (Hepatitis B vaccine is administered then).  What connection is there between formaldehyde and Formalin in vaccines with childhood cancers?  How does that question correlate with this information from the National Cancer Institute FactSheet Childhood Cancers?

Among the 12 major types of childhood cancers, leukemias (blood cell cancers) and cancers of the brain and central nervous system account for more than half of the new cases. About one-third of childhood cancers are leukemias. The most common type of leukemia in children is acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The most common solid tumors are brain tumors (e.g., gliomas and medulloblastomas), with other solid tumors (e.g., neuroblastomas, Wilms tumors, and sarcomas such as rhabdomyosarcoma and osteosarcoma) being less common.

Now go back and read what the Carcinogens Background Document found and see if there are any dots that can be connected.  Shouldn’t some member of Congress be asking questions or investigating vaccines?*

_____________________________
*Sursa: http://vactruth.com/2012/02/07/formaldehyde-vaccines-dna-adduct/

* * * * *

In final, tare i-as intreba pe cei care apara dogma vaccinarii cu dintii: nu-i asa ca veti continua sa va vaccinati copii si dupa ce ati aflat ca vaccinurile contin o substanta in sfarsit confirmata din surse oficiale ca fiind CANCERIGENA? Daca ati afla ca aldehida formica e prezenta intr-un anume aliment, ati renunta la acel aliment imediat, dar afland ca se afla in vaccinuri si este injectat direct in corpul copiilor (trecand deci de bariera protectiei cutane si stomacale!!), asta v-ar deranja cumva somnul lin? ;-((((

Un comentariu:

  1. Feli, ca sa stii ce ai sa promovezi :P

    http://www.qbebe.ro/bebelusul/sanatate/primele_teste,_vaccinari_si_vizite_la_medic_ale_bebelusului_tau

    :))))

    RăspundețiȘtergere